Post by Venter on Jun 29, 2013 13:18:38 GMT -5
If we are required to be LABELED as one of the above Political Parties, then isn't this a form of Forced Discrimination?
Think about it.
I was thinking about the Sheriff Election, and how Mike Redding decided to "turn" Democrat in order to force a General Election for the Sheriff in November.
The Sheriff is not, nor should it be a Politically Charged Position.
If the Sheriff, or Coroner, or Tax Collector needs to ask your Political Affiliation, then something's wrong with the system.
Why should someone in a "Party" get to decide who will run against another Party Member?
Whittling it down to the "Best" Candidate in either Party may be robbing us of a chance to have the better candidates, regardless of Party.
Making us "Choose a Side" immediately divides a population by certain criteria.
One Side is FORBIDDEN to Select from within the others' ranks.
Sounds like Profiling to me
Think about it.
I was thinking about the Sheriff Election, and how Mike Redding decided to "turn" Democrat in order to force a General Election for the Sheriff in November.
The Sheriff is not, nor should it be a Politically Charged Position.
If the Sheriff, or Coroner, or Tax Collector needs to ask your Political Affiliation, then something's wrong with the system.
Why should someone in a "Party" get to decide who will run against another Party Member?
Whittling it down to the "Best" Candidate in either Party may be robbing us of a chance to have the better candidates, regardless of Party.
Making us "Choose a Side" immediately divides a population by certain criteria.
One Side is FORBIDDEN to Select from within the others' ranks.
Sounds like Profiling to me
