|
|
Post by SpellChecker on Sept 29, 2010 22:30:22 GMT -5
What is the deal with NCG trying to prove that they weren't out numbered at the hearing?
There was another letter in the times today with them disputing the facts and YES NCG THIS IS THE FACT YOU WERE OUT NUMBERED.
I just don't see what their point is here and why they are trying so hard to prove it and to whom???
They know there were more pro's signed up to speak. They know why the pro's consolidated their testimony.
You idiots are even trying to tell the PGCB they are wrong???
Does it bother you moron's that bad because the PGCB was impressed the pro's did them a favor by shortening the hearing?
|
|
HoneyBadger
Poster Child
HoneyBadger don't give a shit.
Posts: 373
|
Post by HoneyBadger on Sept 30, 2010 7:03:12 GMT -5
What is the deal with NCG trying to prove that they weren't out numbered at the hearing? There was another letter in the times today with them disputing the facts and YES NCG THIS IS THE FACT YOU WERE OUT NUMBERED. I just don't see what their point is here and why they are trying so hard to prove it and to whom??? They know there were more pro's signed up to speak. They know why the pro's consolidated their testimony. You idiots are even trying to tell the PGCB they are wrong??? Does it bother you moron's that bad because the PGCB was impressed the pro's did them a favor by shortening the hearing? C'mon, when have they told the truth about anything since this began? I read Dave Crowner's letter and all of the other letters about numbers. What we need to do - again - is put our numbers out there. X number of speakers represented X number of people for a total of __ consolidated speakers and the number of single speakers was X. They are still trying - presumably since they have nothing better to do with their pathetic little lives - to discredit us. I didn't keep track of numbers that day but surely we know exactly how many people were represented on our side. |
|
|
|
Post by Rainier Wolfcastle on Sept 30, 2010 7:21:30 GMT -5
What bothers me is that barely more than a week ago the Times said they wouldn't print any more casino LTE's that rehashed topics already discussed to the point of nausea yet here we have ANOTHER letter disputing the PGCB OFFICIAL count of registered speakers for the hearing. Not only did the Times go back on their word but they did so in order to print something that is completely false and easily proven so with a quick look at the registered speakers list from the hearing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fire Marshal Bill on Sept 30, 2010 8:11:30 GMT -5
Just another spin they are trying to use. Not sure what the story is, as you recall, we were told that the PGCB requested BOTH sides to consolidate testimony but using the affidavits and having one person speaking for several if they were going to say the same thing. Well along this line the NCG folks say that this is not true, the Pro side did this on their own with no prior knowledge by the PGCB but they reluctantly accepted it, and of course the NCG say they are questioning the legality of this action.
Now they are back to the argument that because it has a Gettysburg mailing address, and that most likely they will use Gettysburg in marketing and advertisement, it is in Gettysburg, and thus is a national issue.
Gosh I am getting tired of it, and so worried that somehow the stupidity will rub off, as I am sure some of these people are living very close to me, or I may come in close proximity to them in the course of my travels and work.
|
|
|
|
Post by lifesaver on Sept 30, 2010 8:44:04 GMT -5
Had an interesting conversation with some coworkers last night. One was reading the Times and the LTE's and asked if anyone knew when they would decide on the casino. I answered hopefully by the end of the year. The rest of the conversation then centered on hoping the casino license would be awarded here and commenting on the idiocy of the NCG crowd and the comment was made "IT SHOULD BE DECIDED BY US, THE LOCALS". It was LMAOROTFL when I told them about Libby's suicide tunnels. I don't think the NCG is fooling too many locals. And I firmly believe that the local support is our best bet in tipping the scales in our favor. And for all you lurkers out there, this conversation occurred at break time.
|
|
|
|
Post by SpellChecker on Sept 30, 2010 8:56:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by chuckroast on Sept 30, 2010 9:25:02 GMT -5
when will a final vote and decision take place?
|
|
HoneyBadger
Poster Child
HoneyBadger don't give a shit.
Posts: 373
|
Post by HoneyBadger on Sept 30, 2010 13:50:22 GMT -5
Had an interesting conversation with some coworkers last night. One was reading the Times and the LTE's and asked if anyone knew when they would decide on the casino. I answered hopefully by the end of the year. The rest of the conversation then centered on hoping the casino license would be awarded here and commenting on the idiocy of the NCG crowd and the comment was made "IT SHOULD BE DECIDED BY US, THE LOCALS". It was LMAOROTFL when I told them about Libby's suicide tunnels. I don't think the NCG is fooling too many locals. And I firmly believe that the local support is our best bet in tipping the scales in our favor. And for all you lurkers out there, this conversation occurred at break time. Funny isn't it lifesaver that we have to justify our personal time at work to pathetic lurkers who don't have the courage to face us? |
|
